Thursday, July 18, 2013

Immigration in the White House

This blog is the outline from a speech I gave in Eric Young's Persuasion class at DSU. It is about how much immigration contributes to the American dream & I wanted to share it. Watch the video connected to the link first so that the premises can be more easily understood.


Theoretical premise

1.   Theoretical premise: In order to create an effective message one should not confine oneself to any single theoretical premise; rather, apply as many theories into the creation of the message as is practical.

a.   The artifact is an email with a video I received as a June 14th update from White House.gov titled “The White House is full of people who come from different places. Some a little farther than others.”



b.   About immigrants that work in the White House.

c.    Marringer and Stapel[i] (2009) state that “people are active agents in the construction of their social realities, people’s own thoughts and feelings play an important role in how they complete their impressions of others”.
d.     Obama’s PR people have done a good job of putting together a good example of applying many theories in the creation of this artifact.


2.   Ethical Responsibility

a.   Subtly it asks us to accept the ethical responsibility to accept the immigrant population because that is the American dream.
b.   With the use of old immigration photos we are reminded of our own ancestors arriving and seeking the same American dream the newcomers now seek.
c.    We feel the responsibility to ethically treat the newcomers as our ancestors wanted to be treated.

3.   Dialogic

a.   The viewer becomes part of the dialogue because the interviewee often speaks to the camera. There are several Dialogic theses used in the film:

b.   These are people that help make America work.

c.    Each holds a stake in the nation –

d.   “We are a nation of immigrants. We bring together different ideas, different cultures, different races”
    
e.   “a nation of laws... a nation of immigrants”

f.     “America has the power to bring people to its shores to help build a better country”  --overlaps into epistemic
 

4.   Epistemic

a.   Epistemically that American Dream is a faith that we have, built on our heritage. We react to this faith emotionally as well.
b.   One speaker gives us part of that American Dream: “it seems to be a universal thought that people come here to do things that they never thought they could do anywhere else”
c.    Also the “expression of gratitude” reinforces that American Dream scenario.

5.   Narrative Approaches

a.   Each speaker has a story to share.
b.   We become engaged in the story and that builds affection and empathy for the speaker and the cause.


6.   Dual Process

a.   Whether the viewer approaches the film from the peripheral or the central processing route, there is something in the film to persuade.

b.   Peripherally we are drawn to the narratives and the emotion attached to the photos, as well as the mention of family values and the struggles their parents endured to make a place for their families in this country.

c.    Centrally we process that the idea of sharing the American Dream and as mentioned before as a responsibility we need to acknowledge.

d.   We may process the immigrant’s mentioning that his parents “learned English” in a peripheral way, yet when we centrally examine what we are seeing, we also notice that all the speakers learned English and speak it well. 


7.   Semiotics

a.   Family pictures and clips of immigrants are signs and symbols that bring nostalgia to the forefront. Note the use of the photo of Nancy’s ‘son’ in uniform.
b.   The symbolic nature of the uniform symbolizes that she has made the same sacrifice as millions of other parents whose children serve in the armed forces.

8.   Semantics

a.   There is mention of the words: “talent”, “drive” and “ambition” and the way the use of the word “we” reaches out to put its arms around the viewer.
b.   Family and values oriented wording
9.   Aristotle spoke of the segmented audience ... i.e. speaker must adapt to the context:


a.   Who is the target audience of this piece?
b.   The left wing audience is all “yeah, yeah this is exactly what I want to hear”. Obama is reinforcing what the audience already knows.
c.    The right wing audience is all “Hey, what are all those people from terrorist and former communist countries doing working in the White House”?
d.   Neither of these is the primary target audience. The target is the fence sitter who is not sure where he/she stands … the swing vote. Politically speaking I think one can say that the target audience is always the swing vote. Short of a really big event that turns everyone’s head, such as Watergate, your supporters are always going to love you and your detractors are always going to hate you. So your advertising focus is not on changing the minds of your detractors, but on changing the minds of enough of the swing vote to accomplish your goal.
10.                 Primarily the use of pathos is involved in this piece, but all three become involved.

a.   Hard work is produced from these immigrants. (a value held dear to working class Americans).
b.   Clips from the 30’s of immigrants arriving on ships relate the viewer back to his/her own ancestors who arrived in much the same way.
c.    Pathos is felt from the message, but not necessarily evident in the delivery of the message. There are no serious emotional appeals, but rather the emotion is felt within the receiver of the message, based on the narratives and symbols within the film.
d.   “Pathos may involve the content of the appeal” –Each person described how his/her parent(s) were hard working individuals, who raised a family while seeking the American dream. (To dispel the concept that immigrants come here to live off welfare).
11.                 What is the American dream really? Is it becoming rich or is it the freedom to make the world a better place for your children and grandchildren.
12.                 Examples represent logos.
a.   we’re sort of bound up with some vary shared goals (note the goals are not mentioned) and
b.   we all want the same kind of future for our kids (again not elaborated)
c.    who are all going to be Americans who come after us” (creating a connection to the audience).
d.   Hard work is produced from these immigrants. (a value held dear to working class Americans).
13.                 Ethos: All these combine to form a delivery of the material that is quite effective to the target audience.
14.                 A couple of cautions:

a.   “Araya and Ekehammer state that “when people are instructed to suppress their prejudice, they tend to increase their prejudice level dramatically compared to when they were not instructed to do so” (Araya & Ekehammer, 2009, p. 330)[ii].
b.   “Asking perceivers to forget or disregard stereotypic information may enhance the false memories of stereotypic behaviors” (Araya & Ekehammer, 2009, p. 330).
15.                 Compliance Gaining

a.   Calls to action are encompassed in the film as well as on the webpage found by following the link in the email.
b.   Ends with an invitation to “share your story” again creating unity with the target audience.
c.    On the email is found the implied statement “My plan to solve the immigration problem is right here ... follow the link”.




[i] Maringer, M. and Stapel, D. A., (17 February 2009) Correction or comparison? The effects of prime awareness on social judgments. European Journal of Psychology, 39, pp719-733, DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.569.
[ii] Araya & Ekehammer, 2009, p. 330.